Tuesday, May 14, 2019

Ethical dilemma Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Ethical dilemma - Case Study shellSome of them whitethorn have wakeless financial backgrounds while others may not have sound financial abilities. In the given case study, Karen Hathaway has to select peerless person from the list of three to a higher position. All the three persons in delveation have advantages and disadvantages which made Karens task highly difficult. Carmen was an African American widow of age 34 who has one child. She was an average performer and had eight old age experience in the industry, out of which four long time was with the comp either. Her child has some medical problems and she was badly in need of more money. Ralph one among the other two competing for the higher position was a white, aged 57 and had three children. Ralph has been with the company for twenty years and in the industry for thirty. He has always been a lulu performer, with mostly average ratings. He has denied promotion earlier because of his reluctance to relocate. However, he had no such problems at present and was ready to relocate. Yingzi was the third candidate under consideration. She was an Asian, single, aged 27 and had provided three years experience in the company. Even though she was the lower-ranking among the three, she had outstanding track records and management skills. It is evident from the three cases mentioned above that Yingzi had better performance record than the other two even though she was a junior in the company and had less experience than the others. Her track records show that she was ready to go up to any extent if she faces any employment discrimination. Ralph on the other hand was the most experienced person in the company and it is unethical to deny him the promotion since he is approaching his retirement. Carmen was the best friend of Karen and she was badly in need of a promotion because of her poor financial abilities and the necessity of huge money to treat her only child. In short, the problem in this case study is what should be given more weightage while decision making promotion performance merit or ethical principles? If Carmen failed to get promotion, employees may consider it as an vitrine of racial discrimination sine she was an African American widower. Karen may face the charges of prejudice and bias if she promotes Carmen since Carmen was one of the better friends of Karen. Ralphs son was getting married to the vice presidents daughter which substance the learn of ralph in the company is going to be increased. Yingzi on the other hand is engaged to the son of one of the upper management individual. Carmen was also supported by some of the upper managers. In short, each(prenominal) the three candidates had great support from different top managers in the company. Since all the three candidates have their aver claims, advantages and disadvantages, it is better to analyze the cases and claims one by one. Karen has three choices 1) consider the influence of the candidates in the organi zation 2) consider the merits of the candidates 3) consider the ethical claims of the candidates. The major strength of Yingzi is her performance whereas that of Ralph was his experience. Carmen on the other hand had the strength of honorable support and better relations with Karen. At the same time Carmens better relations with Karen may become a threat to her promotion scopes if Karen decides to boost her image in the organization. All the three candidates had their influence in the organizat

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.